Choosing & Sequencing the Five Works
- Balance range against coherence when assembling the five works
- Diagnose and fix a set that is really five variations of one object
- Present works that are large, fragile, site-specific, or time-based
Range and coherence are not opposites
Because the five works do not have to share an inquiry, range is available to you — different materials, processes, scales, and structural problems — and range shows a reader that your skill transfers rather than being one trick. But range is not variety for its own sake: every one of the five still has to stand on its own. A practical target is that each work should show something the others do not — a different process family, a different structural problem, a different relationship of solid to void, a different scale — while all five sit at a comparable level of resolution. The set is only as strong as its weakest piece, because that piece tells the reader what you produce when you are not at your best. Never add a work purely to widen the range.
Five variations of one object: the classic failure
If the five are five thrown bowls, five wire figures, or five versions of the same mask, a reader learns one thing about you and reads four redundancies. Diagnose it by asking what each work is for: if two works answer the same problem with the same process at the same scale, one of them is spending a slot for nothing. The fix is not to bolt on something weak — it is to name the missing dimension (a subtractive process if everything is additive; a hand-scale or body-scale piece if everything is table-top; a work where the void does the work if everything is solid mass) and either promote an existing work that already covers it or build one deliberately. Note how this differs from the Sustained Investigation: there a consistent line of inquiry is the whole point, whereas here five near-duplicates simply waste slots.
Hard-to-present work: large, fragile, site-specific, time-based
Some of your strongest work will not sit on a table under a light. Large or installed work: shoot it in the space it needs, but control the background as far as you can — a clean wall, a lit corner, clutter removed — and include a scale reference so the size is unmistakable; the usual mistake is one distant snapshot with no detail. Fragile or ephemeral work: photograph it thoroughly while it exists, from every view you might later want, because there is no second chance. Site-specific work: the site is part of the piece, so show the relationship to the site in at least one view and add a closer view where form and surface can still be read. Time-based, kinetic, or wearable work: choose the moment that carries the idea, use a second view to show another state or position, and use the written response to state briefly what happens over time — a still photograph cannot show motion, so the words have to name it. In every case a reader can only score what the images and the short response convey.
A student’s five candidates are: (1) a thrown and glazed stoneware jar, (2) a second thrown jar with a different glaze, (3) a small wire figure, (4) a carved basswood torso, and (5) a room-scale installation of hanging thread that exists only while it is up. How should the set be adjusted and presented?
- 1.Ask what each slot contributes: the two thrown jars answer the same problem with the same process at the same scale, so the second jar is spending a slot on a glaze variation rather than a new demonstration.
- 2.Check what range the set already has: the jar, the wire figure, and the carving cover additive building in clay, linear construction in space, and subtractive carving — what is thin is anything beyond table-top scale, and the installation covers exactly that.
- 3.Replace the redundant jar with the strongest remaining candidate that adds a dimension the set lacks, rather than with another vessel.
- 4.Plan the installation’s documentation now, while it is standing: a full view in the space with clutter removed and a person or doorway for scale, a second view from inside or beneath, and a detail of how the threads are anchored — because once it is down it cannot be reshot.
- 5.Plan for the small and fragile work too: the wire figure needs a raking-light detail so its linear structure does not vanish against the background, and every work that can sit on the same neutral background should.
The temptation with ephemeral or installed work is to postpone photography until the piece is "properly finished". By then it may be taken down, wilted, melted, or in a dumpster. Shoot ephemeral, site-specific, and time-based work every time it is up, from more views than you think you will need.
Lay every candidate out as an image side by side and label each with its process, its scale, and the 3-D problem it solves. Duplicates become obvious immediately — and so does the gap you should be building into.
A student’s five Selected Works are five wheel-thrown bowls of similar size, differing mainly in glaze. What is the strongest objection?
One of your five works is a room-scale hanging installation that exists only while it is up. What is the best documentation approach?
Answer the 2 checkpoints as you read.
Sign in to save your progress