Choosing 5 Works That Show Your 3-D Skills
- Explain how Selected Works differs from the Sustained Investigation
- Select 5 works that demonstrate the strongest command of form, volume, mass, and plane
- Evaluate a candidate work against the two Selected Works rubric rows
What Selected Works is — and is not
Selected Works is the second portfolio component, worth 40% of your score: 5 works presented at the highest possible quality, and because they are three-dimensional, most will use a second image to show another viewpoint or a detail. Unlike the Sustained Investigation, these works need not share an inquiry or relate to one another — each stands alone to show what you can do. Readers score two rows: 3-D skills (command of form, volume, mass, plane, and the principles in space) and skillful synthesis of materials, processes, and ideas. Pick the 5 works that show both most convincingly.
Selecting for 3-D skill and range
With only 5 works standing for you, each must earn its place. Strong candidates show clear command of the 3-D elements — form, volume, mass, plane — and thoughtful use of the principles in three dimensions — balance as real stability, movement as the viewer’s path around the work, proportion as actual scale, plus unity, contrast, emphasis, and rhythm. Look for works where a reader can point to decisions: an intentional distribution of mass, an emphasis that draws the eye around the form, a resolved relationship between solid and void. Some range of material or approach shows flexibility — but never add a weak piece just for variety.
Reading a work against the rubric before you submit
Score each candidate yourself on the two rows. For 3-D skills, ask: is the command of form, mass, and space intentional and accomplished, or accidental? For synthesis, ask: do the materials and processes serve an idea, or is it a technical demo? A perfectly crafted vessel with nothing behind it can stall on the synthesis row; an ambitious idea that is structurally clumsy can stall on the skills row. The strongest Selected Works satisfy both — resolved craft and an idea the material carries.
A student must cut Selected Works from 8 candidates to 5. Two finalists: (A) a flawlessly thrown, glazed ceramic vase of conventional form, and (B) a slightly rougher welded-steel piece whose opening voids make absence the subject. How should they reason?
- 1.Score each against Row 1 (3-D skills): A shows refined craft and control of volume; B shows competent but less polished fabrication — A leads here, but B is not weak.
- 2.Score each against Row 2 (synthesis of materials, processes, and ideas): A is beautifully made but idea-thin; B fuses process (welding, cutting voids) to an idea about absence — B leads clearly.
- 3.Weigh both rows rather than judging on polish alone: Selected Works rewards skill and synthesis, and B satisfies both while A largely satisfies only skills.
- 4.Decide with the whole set in mind: if the other four already show refined craft, B contributes synthesis the portfolio lacks; keep B.
Do not treat Selected Works as "my 5 favorite objects." A common loss is submitting technically pretty but idea-thin pieces that show little synthesis, or decorative craft objects that reveal little command of form, mass, and space. Judge each candidate by the two rubric rows, not by personal attachment or hours invested.
How does the Selected Works component differ from the Sustained Investigation?
Photograph every candidate from its best angle and lay the images out together, scoring each on both rows from 1–4. Seeing them side by side reveals whether a weak row (all craft, no synthesis) runs through the whole set — and stops you from choosing five nearly identical objects.
A Selected Works sculpture shows immaculate craft but no discernible idea — purely a display of technical skill. On which rubric row is it most likely to fall short?
Answer the 2 checkpoints as you read.
Sign in to save your progress