Choosing 5 Works That Show Your Drawing Skills
- Explain how Selected Works differs from the Sustained Investigation
- Select 5 works that demonstrate the strongest command of mark, line, value, and composition
- Evaluate a candidate drawing against the two Selected Works rubric rows
What Selected Works is — and is not
Selected Works is the second portfolio component, worth 40% of your score: 5 works presented at the highest possible quality (some may include a second detail image). Unlike the Sustained Investigation, these works need not share an inquiry or relate to one another — each stands alone to show what you can do. Readers score two rows: drawing skills (command of mark-making, line quality, light and shadow, and composition) and skillful synthesis of materials, processes, and ideas. Choose the 5 drawings that show those two things most convincingly, whatever their subject.
Selecting for drawing skill and range
With only 5 works standing for you, each must carry weight. Strong candidates show clear command of mark-making and line quality, control of light and shadow (value) to build form and drama, and intentional composition in the format. Look for drawings where a reader can point to decisions: a deliberate value structure, marks chosen for character rather than habit, an emphasis that guides the eye. Some range — of media, mark, or problem — shows flexibility, but never include a weaker drawing just for variety. Five focused, accomplished works beat five that merely differ.
Reading a work against the rubric before you submit
Score each candidate yourself on the two rows. For drawing skills, ask: is the command of mark, line, value, and composition intentional and accomplished, or accidental? For synthesis, ask: do the media and marks serve an idea, or is it a rendering exercise? A photorealistic pencil drawing with nothing behind it can stall on the synthesis row; an inventive idea drawn clumsily can stall on the skills row. The strongest Selected Works satisfy both — accomplished drawing and an idea the marks carry.
A student must cut Selected Works from 8 candidates to 5. Two finalists: (A) a photorealistic graphite rendering of a shoe, and (B) a slightly less tidy charcoal drawing whose violent erasure and mark-making evoke memory loss. How should they reason?
- 1.Score each against Row 1 (drawing skills): A shows immaculate rendering and value control; B shows strong but rougher mark-making — A leads here, but B is not weak.
- 2.Score each against Row 2 (synthesis of materials, processes, and ideas): A is a flawless exercise with little idea; B fuses process (erasure, aggressive marks) to an idea about memory — B leads clearly.
- 3.Weigh both rows rather than judging on polish alone: Selected Works rewards skill and synthesis, and B satisfies both while A largely satisfies only skills.
- 4.Decide with the whole set in mind: if the other four already show rendering, B adds synthesis the portfolio lacks; keep B.
Do not treat Selected Works as "my 5 most impressive renderings." A common loss is submitting technically dazzling but idea-thin drawings that show little synthesis. Photorealism is not automatically a high score — judge each candidate by the two rubric rows, not by how "realistic" or time-consuming it was.
How does the Selected Works component differ from the Sustained Investigation?
Lay all your candidate drawings out together and score each on both rows from 1–4 before choosing. Seeing them side by side reveals whether a weak row (all rendering, no synthesis) runs through the whole set — and prevents the mistake of five near-identical showpieces.
A Selected Works drawing shows breathtaking photorealistic rendering but no discernible idea — purely a display of technique. On which rubric row is it most likely to fall short?
Answer the 2 checkpoints as you read.
Sign in to save your progress