How Independence Was Won: Negotiation, War, and Partition
- Compare negotiated, armed, and partitioned paths to independence
- Explain why the Second World War accelerated decolonization
- Analyze the inherited problems facing new states
Why after 1945
Decolonization was not sudden generosity, and the causes are specific. The imperial powers were exhausted: Britain and France were financially drained and materially damaged, and Britain was dependent on American loans. The colonial powers had been visibly defeated — Japan's early victories destroyed the presumption of European invincibility across Asia, and France had been occupied. Colonial soldiers returned from fighting for empires having been promised reform, and their expectations were organized. The new superpowers were both nominally anticolonial: the United States pressed for decolonization at least rhetorically, and the Soviet Union supported anticolonial movements materially, so imperial powers had no great-power backing. The UN Charter endorsed self-determination. And nationalist movements had decades of organization behind them — the Indian National Congress dated to 1885. Independence was won by movements exploiting a moment when refusal had become expensive and indefensible.
Three paths
Sort the cases, because the exam asks you to compare. Negotiated: India (1947), where Gandhi's mass campaigns of satyagraha — non-cooperation, the Salt March, boycott — made India ungovernable by consent without making it conquerable by force, and where Britain ultimately transferred power to Nehru and the Congress; Ghana (1957), where Nkrumah's "positive action" of strikes and boycotts won the first sub-Saharan independence. Armed struggle: Algeria (1954–62), where France regarded Algeria as part of France itself and fought a war marked by torture and mass civilian death, costing perhaps hundreds of thousands of Algerian lives before de Gaulle conceded; Vietnam against France; Kenya, where the Mau Mau insurgency was suppressed with mass detention and killing; the Portuguese colonies, which required a revolution in Portugal itself in 1974. Partition: India–Pakistan in 1947, where hurried division on religious lines produced roughly ten to fifteen million displaced and hundreds of thousands to a million or more killed; and Palestine in 1947–48, whose partition and war produced a conflict still unresolved. The variable that best predicts the path is whether the colonial power had a settler population or strategic commitment it refused to abandon — where it did, the road ran through war.
What the new states inherited
Independence handed governments a structural inheritance that explains much of what followed, and describing it is better analysis than judging outcomes. Borders drawn by outsiders — the Berlin Conference lines — cut through peoples and combined rivals, so building a national identity was a task rather than a starting point. Economies were built for extraction: single export crops or minerals, railways running to ports rather than between towns, and almost no manufacturing, which meant vulnerability to commodity prices and continued dependence on former rulers. Administration was thin, since colonial policy had trained few local professionals — a frequently cited figure is that Congo had a mere handful of university graduates at independence. Divide-and-rule had hardened ethnic and religious categories, sometimes fatally, as in Rwanda where Belgian classification of Hutu and Tutsi with identity cards was later used for the 1994 genocide. Add Cold War pressure to align, and the frequency of coups, one-party states, and civil war becomes explicable without recourse to claims about the capacities of new nations — which is exactly the argument a strong essay makes.
Explain ONE reason some colonies achieved independence through negotiation while others required armed struggle.
- 1.Identify the decisive variable: whether the colonial power had a large settler population or treated the territory as integral to the metropole.
- 2.Give the negotiated case: Britain had no large settler population in India and, exhausted after the war and facing mass non-cooperation, transferred power.
- 3.Give the armed case: France regarded Algeria as part of France and had a substantial settler population there, so it fought an eight-year war before conceding independence.
Gandhi's strategy of satyagraha was effective against British rule primarily because it
Explain post-independence instability through inherited structures — imposed borders, extractive economies, thin administration, hardened ethnic categories, Cold War pressure — never through claims about the readiness or capacity of new nations. The first is a causal argument with evidence; the second reproduces the colonial justification the unit exists to examine.
Migration, and the empire arriving in the metropole
Decolonization redirected migration, and the consequence is one of the clearest continuities into Unit 9. Postwar labor shortages plus imperial citizenship brought South Asian and Caribbean migrants to Britain — the Windrush generation from 1948 — North and West African migrants to France, Turkish Gastarbeiter to West Germany, and Indonesian and Surinamese migrants to the Netherlands. Later flows included refugees from proxy wars and, from the 1970s, migration driven by economic disparity. The effects reshaped receiving societies: multi-ethnic cities, new cuisines, music and literature; contests over citizenship, language and schooling; and nativist political movements. Note the causal irony worth stating in an essay — imperial powers that had spent a century insisting the world was one interconnected empire found, on decolonization, that people took the claim seriously and moved to the center. Diaspora communities then sent remittances that became major components of some national economies, another link forward to globalization.
The partition of India in 1947 is best characterized as
Answer the 2 checkpoints as you read.
Sign in to save your progress