← Back to course

Interpreting Arguments & Connecting Ideas

You’ll be able to

Reading argumentative texts critically

Texts about global challenges — climate, migration, inequality — are argumentative, so interpret them by mapping their structure. Look for the thesis (These, Hauptaussage), the reasons that support it, and any concessions to the other side. Signal words guide you: einerseits … andererseits (“on one hand … on the other”), trotzdem (“nonetheless”), deshalb / deswegen (“therefore”), zum Beispiel (“for example”). Distinguish fact (Studien zeigen…, “Studies show…”) from opinion (Ich bin überzeugt…, “I am convinced…”) to answer questions about the author’s stance accurately.

Two-way prepositions: accusative or dative

Nine Wechselpräpositionen (two-way prepositions) — an, auf, hinter, in, neben, über, unter, vor, zwischen — take either case depending on meaning. Use the accusative for motion toward a destination (answering wohin?, “to where?”) and the dative for a static location (answering wo?, “where?”). Compare Die Flüchtlinge gehen in das Land (accusative: movement into) with Sie leben in dem Land (dative: located in). The same preposition, two cases, two meanings — a favorite testing point.

Connectors that build a persuasive response

To argue well in writing, chain your ideas with cohesive devices. Introduce a view with meiner Meinung nach (“in my opinion”); add support with außerdem (“furthermore”) and darüber hinaus (“moreover”); concede with zwar … aber (“admittedly … but”) or obwohl (“although”); conclude with zusammenfassend (“to summarize”) or letztendlich (“ultimately”). These connectors turn a list of sentences into a structured argument — exactly what the essay task rewards. Remember which are subordinating (obwohl → verb last) and which are adverbs (deshalb → still V2).

Worked example

Choose the correct case: “Wir müssen gemeinsam gegen den Klimawandel kämpfen. Nur so schaffen wir eine bessere Zukunft für ____ Welt (in / this world).” Then decide the case in “Die Politik muss in ____ Zukunft investieren” (“must invest in the future” — motion/goal).

  1. 1.First blank uses “für,” which always takes the accusative regardless of meaning: “für die Welt.”
  2. 2.For the second, “in” is a two-way preposition, so ask wohin? or wo? — “investing in the future” expresses a goal/direction toward, so use the accusative.
  3. 3.Feminine accusative of “die Zukunft” with the definite article is “die Zukunft”; with the idea “into the future” it stays accusative: “in die Zukunft.”
  4. 4.Confirm the contrast: static “in der Zukunft” (dative) would mean “at some point in the future,” but “investieren in” signals goal → accusative.
Answer: It is “eine bessere Zukunft für die Welt” (accusative after “für”) and “in die Zukunft investieren” (accusative, because “investieren in” expresses direction toward a goal, answering wohin?).
Watch out

For two-way prepositions, do not guess by the preposition alone — test the verb’s meaning. Movement toward a goal (wohin?) → accusative; fixed position (wo?) → dative. Ich hänge das Bild an die Wand (accusative, hanging it up) vs. Das Bild hängt an der Wand (dative, already there).

Checkpoint

In “Viele Menschen ziehen in die Stadt, weil es dort Arbeit gibt,” why is “in die Stadt” accusative?

On the exam

The AP argumentative essay is scored partly on organization and cohesion. Open with a clear thesis, devote a paragraph to each supporting reason with a connector (erstens…, außerdem…), acknowledge a counterargument (zwar… aber…), and close with zusammenfassend. A visible structure lifts your score even when small errors remain.

Checkpoint

An author writes: “Zwar ist erneuerbare Energie teuer, aber langfristig schützt sie das Klima.” What rhetorical move is the author making?

Answer the 2 checkpoints as you read.

Sign in to save your progress