Party & Electoral Systems unit test
A test on this unit alone, marked as a percentage and a letter grade — for the test your class is actually sitting, rather than for May. Answer everything, then submit once: seeing the answer to question 3 before attempting question 4 makes the final percentage meaningless.
Nigeria's party system
Party discipline
State corporatism
Nigeria's presidential formula
Clientelism and patronage
Mixed electoral systems
Mexico's current party landscape
Referendums
Duverger's law
Interest groups: pluralist vs corporatist
Iran's factions rather than parties
Single-member district plurality
Short answer 1. Define or explain: Why concentration matters under SMD
3 ptsShort answer 2. Define or explain: Proportional representation
3 ptsShort answer 3. Define or explain: Two-round (runoff) systems
3 ptsShort answer 4. Define or explain: Russia's systemic opposition
3 ptsFree response
5 ptsQUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS (Question 2). Examine the table, transcribed: WOMEN AS A PERCENTAGE OF MEMBERS IN THE SINGLE OR LOWER CHAMBER OF THE NATIONAL LEGISLATURE, SELECTED COURSE COUNTRIES (Inter-Parliamentary Union, Parline database, figures as of 2024) Country Chamber Percentage women Mexico Chamber of Deputies 50.0 United Kingdom House of Commons 40.5 China National People's Congress 26.5 Russia State Duma 16.4 Iran Islamic Consultative Assembly 5.6 Nigeria House of Representatives 3.9
A. Using the data in the table, identify the course country with the highest percentage of women in its legislature.
B. Using the data in the table, describe a difference between Mexico and Nigeria.
C. Describe an electoral system feature that can affect the representation of women in a legislature.
D. Using the data in the table, draw a conclusion about the relationship between electoral rules and the representation of women.
E. Explain why a government might adopt policies intended to increase the representation of women in its legislature.