Literary Argumentation unit test
A test on this unit alone, marked as a percentage and a letter grade — for the test your class is actually sitting, rather than for May. Answer everything, then submit once: seeing the answer to question 3 before attempting question 4 makes the final percentage meaningless.
Annotating under time pressure
Earning the sophistication point
Embedding quotations
Quoting poetry correctly
Defensible thesis in literary analysis
Interpretive claim vs observation
Preparing works in advance
Situating in a broader context
Reading the prompt's verb
Choosing a work for the open question
Vivid and persuasive style
Common trap: device-listing
Short answer 1. Define or explain: Signposting without announcing
3 ptsShort answer 2. Define or explain: Thesis that names the how
3 ptsShort answer 3. Define or explain: Analyzing the quotation you chose
3 ptsShort answer 4. Define or explain: Literary argument prompt
3 ptsFree response
6 ptsLITERARY ARGUMENT (Question 3, 6 points). Many works of literature depict a conflict between the old and the new: old worlds, old ways, and old values clash with newer ones. Either from your own reading or from the exam's list, choose a work of fiction in which there is marked tension between the old and the new. Then, in a well-written essay, analyze how the tension between the old and the new contributes to an interpretation of the work as a whole. Do not merely summarize the plot. (The released list of suggested works includes, among others: Things Fall Apart, The Namesake, A Raisin in the Sun, The Remains of the Day, Their Eyes Were Watching God, Frankenstein, The Awakening, Fences, There There, The Night Watchman, and Song of Solomon.) In your response you should: present a thesis with a defensible interpretation; provide evidence to support your line of reasoning; explain how the evidence supports it; and use appropriate grammar and punctuation.