Unit 1: Sustained Investigation
2-D Art & Design · Unit 1 · Paper 3

Sustained Investigation unit test

A test on this unit alone, marked as a percentage and a letter grade — for the test your class is actually sitting, rather than for May. Answer everything, then submit once: seeing the answer to question 3 before attempting question 4 makes the final percentage meaningless.

Each paper is built from this unit’s 50 terms and is the same for everyone, so a teacher can assign “Unit 1, Paper 3” and every student sits the identical test. Multiple choice is marked objectively; the written sections you mark yourself against the model answer and rubric.
Suggested time 34 min 31 points0/17 attempted
1

Inquiry

2

Working from your own photographs

3

Testing one variable at a time

4

Reading a sequence for development

5

Generative AI is not permitted for artwork

6

Including work you dislike

7

Layering and glazing

8

Watercolor discipline

9

The two written responses

10

Writing about failure

11

Textile and fiber approaches in 2-D

12

Scope of an inquiry

Short answer 1. Define or explain: Ground and underpainting

3 pts

Short answer 2. Define or explain: Digital layering and version history

3 pts

Short answer 3. Define or explain: Materials, processes and ideas

3 pts

Short answer 4. Define or explain: Scale of mark relative to format

3 pts

Free response

7 pts

A student submits the following as the inquiry statement for a 2-D Art and Design Sustained Investigation: "I am investigating color."

Explain why this statement does not function as an inquiry.

Rewrite it as a question that could guide fifteen works, and explain what makes your version sustainable across a body of work.

Describe TWO specific investigations in 2-D materials or processes your revised question would generate.

Explain how a reader who cannot see your portfolio would use the written evidence to judge whether the images show inquiry.

Explain the difference between a series of works that repeat an idea and a body of work that investigates one.

Describe one piece of visual evidence that would show a viewer your investigation changed direction in response to what you learned.

Explain why an inquiry stated as a preference rather than a question cannot be evaluated.