Industrialization & Its Effects unit test
A test on this unit alone, marked as a percentage and a letter grade — for the test your class is actually sitting, rather than for May. Answer everything, then submit once: seeing the answer to question 3 before attempting question 4 makes the final percentage meaningless.
Agricultural revolution
Berlin Conference
Second Industrial Revolution
Enclosure
Separate spheres
Limited liability
Child and female labor
Great Exhibition of 1851
Factory system
Railways
Standard of living debate
Socialism
Short answer 1. Define or explain: Why Britain first
3 ptsShort answer 2. Define or explain: Public health reform
3 ptsShort answer 3. Define or explain: Consequences of imperialism for Europe
3 ptsShort answer 4. Define or explain: Demographic transition
3 ptsFree response
7 ptsDOCUMENT-BASED QUESTION. Evaluate the extent to which industrialization changed the position of women in European society from 1750 to 1914. The seven documents below are real historical sources, described here in our own words rather than quoted. The identifying information — author, position, document type and date — is accurate and is the basis for the sourcing point. Document 1 — Testimony gathered by the British Children's Employment Commission on conditions in coal mines, 1842. Women and girls questioned by the commissioners describe hauling loaded corves through low passages on hands and knees for twelve hours, working in water, and returning to domestic work at home afterward; several describe having given birth within days of working underground. The commission's illustrated report caused a public sensation. Document 2 — Sarah Stickney Ellis, The Women of England: Their Social Duties and Domestic Habits, 1839. Ellis, an English writer addressing middle-class readers, argues that a woman's proper sphere is the home, that her influence over husband and sons is her form of power and her contribution to the nation's moral character, and that a household in which the wife engages in paid work has failed in its claim to respectability. Document 3 — Flora Tristan, The Workers' Union, 1843. Tristan, a French socialist writer of Peruvian descent who had traveled among British and French workers, argues that working-class emancipation is impossible while women remain uneducated and legally subordinate, that the neglect of girls' education damages the whole working class, and calls for a workers' organization funded by dues that would build schools admitting girls equally. Document 4 — The Mines and Collieries Act, British Parliament, 1842. Passed after the Children's Employment Commission reported, the act prohibits the employment underground of all women and girls and of boys under ten, and provides for inspectors to enforce it. It offers no alternative employment or compensation. Document 5 — John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women, 1869. Mill, a political economist and member of Parliament who had presented a women's suffrage petition two years earlier, argues that the legal subordination of women is a survival of the law of force, that no one can know what women are capable of while their options are restricted by law and custom, and that marriage as then constituted leaves a wife with fewer legal rights than a servant. Document 6 — Clara Zetkin, address to the International Socialist Women's Conference, 1907. Zetkin, a leader of the German Social Democratic Party and editor of its women's newspaper, argues that women's suffrage must be pursued as part of the class struggle rather than in alliance with bourgeois feminists, since propertied women's interests diverge from those of working women, and demands universal adult suffrage without property qualification. Document 7 — Emmeline Pankhurst, speech delivered in Hartford, Connecticut, 1913. Pankhurst, founder of the Women's Social and Political Union, defends militant tactics — window-breaking, arson of empty buildings, hunger strikes — on the ground that four decades of constitutional petitioning had produced nothing, that women are compelled to obey laws they have no voice in making, and that a civil war waged by women is the only argument governments have shown themselves willing to hear.
Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning. Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt. Support an argument in response to the prompt using at least six documents. Use at least one additional piece of specific historical evidence beyond those found in the documents. For at least three documents, explain how or why the document’s point of view, purpose, historical situation, or audience is relevant to an argument. Demonstrate a complex understanding of the historical development that is the focus of the prompt.